Timeline for Expressing Galois actions on fundamental groups explicitly
Current License: CC BY-SA 3.0
7 events
| when toggle format | what | by | license | comment | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Jul 25, 2011 at 4:05 | answer | added | JSE | timeline score: 4 | |
| Jul 25, 2011 at 1:57 | history | edited | Makhalan Duff | CC BY-SA 3.0 |
deleted 6 characters in body
|
| Jul 25, 2011 at 1:57 | comment | added | Makhalan Duff | David Roberts was too kind, I was just being careless. I'll edit this. | |
| Jul 25, 2011 at 1:50 | comment | added | David Roberts♦ | The OP may be emphasising that $\hat{\pi_1}$ is a topological group, not just a group, but maybe not... | |
| Jul 25, 2011 at 0:36 | comment | added | JSE | Just to clarify the question: I'm not sure what you mean by "(toplogical)," but Gal(Q) acts on the etale fundamental group, not the fundamental group of the complex manifold X(C). I assume this is why you gave the pi a hat. | |
| Jul 24, 2011 at 23:36 | answer | added | Spice the Bird | timeline score: 4 | |
| Jul 24, 2011 at 19:31 | history | asked | Makhalan Duff | CC BY-SA 3.0 |