Timeline for Flatness and local freeness
Current License: CC BY-SA 3.0
6 events
| when toggle format | what | by | license | comment | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Feb 13, 2016 at 16:17 | comment | added | brunoh | @RaviVakil Perhaps you will find my simple little criteria (which is the most general I think) useful for your extraordinary notes! | |
| Oct 11, 2011 at 0:58 | vote | accept | ashpool | ||
| Oct 11, 2011 at 0:58 | |||||
| Oct 11, 2011 at 0:58 | vote | accept | ashpool | ||
| Oct 11, 2011 at 0:58 | |||||
| Jul 21, 2011 at 19:31 | comment | added | Georges Elencwajg | Update . I've just checked Ravi's notes: he has been using the suggested terminology for ages! On the one hand I feel silly about my comment above and on the other I'm happy that these wonderful notes will contribute to the elimination of the confusion alluded to above. | |
| Jul 20, 2011 at 20:28 | comment | added | Georges Elencwajg | Dear Ravi,I have noticed that much confusion here and on similar questions is caused by the ambiguity of the adverb "locally" in "locally blah", which can mean either that you can cover your scheme by opens on which you have "blah", or more weakly that stalks are "blah". Since you are writing a book which, if there is any justice, should become a standard, you might introduce a terminology which would eradicate these misunderstandings. I think Matt's and Daniel's distinction between "Zariski locally blah" [or just "locally blah"] and "stalk-blah" [or "stalkwise-blah"] is quite satisfactory. | |
| Jul 20, 2011 at 16:33 | history | answered | Ravi Vakil | CC BY-SA 3.0 |