Timeline for Cohomology of Springer resolution
Current License: CC BY-SA 3.0
4 events
| when toggle format | what | by | license | comment | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Jul 19, 2011 at 20:23 | vote | accept | user1594 | ||
| Jul 19, 2011 at 18:48 | answer | added | Chuck Hague | timeline score: 9 | |
| Jul 18, 2011 at 22:03 | comment | added | Jim Humphreys |
The typography in the last paragraph got mixed up a little. Aside from that, it's good to keep in mind that most of the machinery makes sense over an algebraically closed field of arbitrary characteristic. This especially includes Kempf's vanishing theorem. Also, many people assume that $B$ corresponds to negative roots in order to avoid some awkwardness about dominant weights.
|
|
| Jul 18, 2011 at 21:40 | history | asked | user1594 | CC BY-SA 3.0 |