Timeline for Why is there such a close resemblance between the unitary representation theory of the Virasoro algebra and that of the Temperley-Lieb algebra?
Current License: CC BY-SA 3.0
8 events
| when toggle format | what | by | license | comment | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Jul 18, 2011 at 19:52 | comment | added | Daniel Litt | I've taken the liberty of fixing the TeX in the second-last paragraph; I hope you don't mind. | |
| Jul 18, 2011 at 19:51 | history | edited | Daniel Litt | CC BY-SA 3.0 |
fixed TeX in second-to-last paragraph
|
| Jul 18, 2011 at 19:13 | comment | added | Stephen | Don't know why the tex in the next to last paragraph is broken. Annoying. | |
| Jul 18, 2011 at 19:12 | history | edited | Stephen | CC BY-SA 3.0 |
deleted 1 characters in body
|
| Jul 18, 2011 at 19:03 | comment | added | Stephen | I edited that bit to be more conservative; I don't know what the right definition of the Cherednik algebra of $S_\infty$ is, but I do think that one gets a meaningul definition of ``unitary set associated to a limiting shape of partitions''. | |
| Jul 18, 2011 at 19:01 | history | edited | Stephen | CC BY-SA 3.0 |
added 2863 characters in body; added 15 characters in body
|
| Jul 18, 2011 at 1:56 | comment | added | André Henriques | Very interesting. You say that "you get a picture very similar..." Could you please describe in a little bit more detail what you get for the Cherednik algebra associated to the infinite permutation group $S_\infty$? | |
| Jul 18, 2011 at 1:37 | history | answered | Stephen | CC BY-SA 3.0 |