Timeline for pointed Hopf algebra
Current License: CC BY-SA 3.0
9 events
| when toggle format | what | by | license | comment | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Jul 26, 2014 at 12:47 | review | Low quality posts | |||
| Jul 26, 2014 at 13:49 | |||||
| S Jul 26, 2014 at 12:47 | history | suggested | user44400 | CC BY-SA 3.0 |
added tag: hopf-algebra
|
| Jul 26, 2014 at 12:44 | review | Suggested edits | |||
| S Jul 26, 2014 at 12:47 | |||||
| Oct 27, 2012 at 3:13 | answer | added | Jesús | timeline score: 1 | |
| Jul 11, 2011 at 19:47 | comment | added | Andriy | ok, sorry! I have got the answer! ma question is really bad. Due to my definition pointed Hopf algebra is more general object, but the problem is that there is really no common definition. Sorry again for non-correct question. | |
| Jul 10, 2011 at 15:27 | comment | added | Noah Snyder | I think it's best to think of "quantum group" as a metaphor and not a definition. | |
| Jul 10, 2011 at 10:41 | comment | added | Julian Kuelshammer | I agree with Theo Johnson-Freyd. Just one further remark: See e.g. work of Andruskiewitsch and Schneider on partial classification of pointed Hopf algebras. Depending on your definition, you can see them as quantum groups or not. (Some also define a quantum group to be exactly a "pointed Hopf algebra"). | |
| Jul 10, 2011 at 0:33 | comment | added | Theo Johnson-Freyd | I don't understand your question. The notion of "quantum group" has been given many definitions, and one of them is nothing more than "Hopf algebra". But others, like "deformation of a universal enveloping algebra", are very restrictive. (Note: neither of these is a particularly useful definition, but I've seen both of them.) So you need to expand your question: explain what you mean by "quantum group", and explain why you are asking your question, and so on. Please read carefully mathoverflow.net/howtoask for more information on asking good MathOverflow questions. | |
| Jul 9, 2011 at 21:06 | history | asked | Andriy | CC BY-SA 3.0 |