Timeline for Ramification in p-division fields associated to elliptic curves with good ordinary reduction
Current License: CC BY-SA 3.0
7 events
when toggle format | what | by | license | comment | |
---|---|---|---|---|---|
Jul 13, 2011 at 13:47 | vote | accept | Álvaro Lozano-Robledo | ||
Jul 10, 2011 at 15:18 | comment | added | Chris Wuthrich | Absolutely correct. I am embarrassed about my mistake. The only thing it shows is that the reduction is ordinary. | |
Jul 9, 2011 at 14:20 | comment | added | Álvaro Lozano-Robledo | Chris, if I am not mistaken, the slopes of the Newton polygon will determine the valuations of the x-coordinates of the 37-torsion points. But even if the valuations of the roots of the polynomial of degree $666$ are $0$, that doesn't mean that the extension generated by the roots is unramified, does it? For instance, the slopes of $1+x+x^2$ are $[0,0]$ for $p=3$ but, of course, the prime $3$ ramifies in $\mathbb{Q}(\zeta_3)/\mathbb{Q}$. | |
Jul 9, 2011 at 8:05 | comment | added | Chris Wuthrich | You won't need to factor your diabolic polynomial; the slopes of the Newton polygon in $\mathbb{Q}_p[x]$ are enough to determine the ramification. In your case there are 666 unit roots and 18 of valuation $−1/18$. | |
Jul 8, 2011 at 20:22 | history | edited | Álvaro Lozano-Robledo | CC BY-SA 3.0 |
added 53 characters in body
|
Jul 8, 2011 at 20:20 | answer | added | Felipe Voloch | timeline score: 13 | |
Jul 8, 2011 at 20:02 | history | asked | Álvaro Lozano-Robledo | CC BY-SA 3.0 |