Skip to main content
6 events
when toggle format what by license comment
May 11, 2014 at 18:44 history edited Ricardo Andrade CC BY-SA 3.0
removed deprecated tag 'topology'; added tag 'sheaf-theory'; corrected non-rendering mathjax; replaced latex code for link with actual link; other minor editing
Jul 8, 2011 at 16:06 vote accept TonyS
Jul 8, 2011 at 0:02 answer added Daniel Bergh timeline score: 3
Jul 7, 2011 at 17:59 comment added TonyS I'm not so well-read in the area of torsors: Why is the obstruction to lifting a section Zariski-locally such a torsor (and in what topology)? And why correspond such torsors to locally free modules of rank 1? Since X is local and the modules are locally free, there is in fact only the trivial $D$-module, so there is no obstruction. Or is this fact not needed? Maybe you know a good book or some literature, where i can just read and learn that by myself.
Jul 7, 2011 at 16:57 comment added Torsten Ekedahl $D^\times$-torsors over some $X$-scheme $Y$ correspond to locally free (formally local in the flat topology) $D_Y$-modules of rank $1$. Such modules are locally free already in the Zeriski topology. Now, the obstruction to lifting a section of $i_\ast F$ is such a torsor and hence the section is liftable Zariski-locally.
Jul 7, 2011 at 16:08 history asked TonyS CC BY-SA 3.0