Timeline for How do we study Iwasawa theory?
Current License: CC BY-SA 3.0
16 events
| when toggle format | what | by | license | comment | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Oct 20, 2018 at 10:00 | comment | added | Watson | Related: math.stackexchange.com/questions/2952440 | |
| Sep 6, 2018 at 15:05 | comment | added | Watson | The book Number theory 3 by Kurokawa, Kurihara, Saito, has a nice chapter which introduces the reader to Iwasawa theory. | |
| S Jul 22, 2017 at 19:41 | history | suggested | kjetil b halvorsen | CC BY-SA 3.0 |
removed unnecessary thanks
|
| Jul 22, 2017 at 10:45 | review | Suggested edits | |||
| S Jul 22, 2017 at 19:41 | |||||
| Jul 21, 2017 at 20:11 | history | edited | GH from MO |
edited tags
|
|
| Jul 9, 2013 at 23:04 | answer | added | Andreas Holmstrom | timeline score: 2 | |
| Jun 22, 2010 at 0:34 | answer | added | Arijit | timeline score: 2 | |
| Dec 2, 2009 at 15:34 | history | edited | Rob Harron |
edited tags
|
|
| Dec 2, 2009 at 0:41 | answer | added | Mahesh Kakde | timeline score: 6 | |
| Nov 27, 2009 at 11:28 | answer | added | Thomas Riepe | timeline score: 6 | |
| Nov 27, 2009 at 7:48 | answer | added | Guillermo Mantilla | timeline score: 6 | |
| Nov 27, 2009 at 5:53 | comment | added | basic | Thank you! wikipedia is a good place, but sometimes, they want it to be more accessible to more people, thus they sometimes don't give a more suitable answer to more involved inquiries. the wiki entry of "Iwasawa theory" is good, but it practically has no explanation about p-adic L-function or the Iwasawa module. It spent too much space to explain the Iwasawa algebra, which could be misleading at some points... just my 2 cents. | |
| Nov 27, 2009 at 5:23 | vote | accept | basic | ||
| Nov 27, 2009 at 5:02 | answer | added | Hunter Brooks | timeline score: 63 | |
| Nov 27, 2009 at 4:40 | comment | added | Yemon Choi | Does the Wikipedia entry for "Iwasawa theory" go any way to answering your queries? | |
| Nov 27, 2009 at 4:12 | history | asked | basic | CC BY-SA 2.5 |