Timeline for $H^4$ of the Monster
Current License: CC BY-SA 3.0
14 events
| when toggle format | what | by | license | comment | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Jul 27, 2017 at 13:35 | history | edited | Ben McKay | CC BY-SA 3.0 |
improved formatting
|
| Jul 27, 2017 at 8:44 | answer | added | Theo Johnson-Freyd | timeline score: 26 | |
| Apr 19, 2017 at 17:08 | comment | added | Theo Johnson-Freyd | Ah, that's why I couldn't find it on msri's website. | |
| Apr 19, 2017 at 8:22 | comment | added | S. Carnahan♦ | @TheoJohnson-Freyd Perhaps you were watching the 57th minute of my talk here: birs.ca/events/2016/5-day-workshops/16w5009/videos | |
| Apr 18, 2017 at 16:28 | comment | added | Theo Johnson-Freyd | @S.Carnahan I might be misremembering --- I can no longer find the video --- but I thought I saw an old MSRI lecture of yours in which you announced a similar result? | |
| Apr 16, 2017 at 1:59 | comment | added | S. Carnahan♦ | @TheoJohnson-Freyd Well, there is semi-public information: Miyamoto announced at a conference last year that he has a proof that the Monster-fixed-point subVOA of $V^\natural$ is $C_2$-cofinite and rational. This more or less implies the conditional arguments in my answer are valid. | |
| Apr 13, 2017 at 16:01 | comment | added | Theo Johnson-Freyd | @S.Carnahan great. I ask because I believe I have made some progress on the question, but don't want to reproduce work that has already been done that I missed | |
| Apr 12, 2017 at 8:11 | comment | added | S. Carnahan♦ | @TheoJohnson-Freyd As of today, I don't think anything publicly available has changed. Naturally, it is a topic of active interest. | |
| Apr 12, 2017 at 0:05 | comment | added | Theo Johnson-Freyd | Has there been recent progress on this question? | |
| Jul 2, 2011 at 19:06 | vote | accept | André Henriques | ||
| Jul 1, 2011 at 5:36 | answer | added | S. Carnahan♦ | timeline score: 29 | |
| Jul 1, 2011 at 0:25 | comment | added | David Roberts♦ | BTW, very nice question :) | |
| Jul 1, 2011 at 0:25 | comment | added | David Roberts♦ | Clearly, it's some sort of associator for the 2-gerbe sitting over the delooping of $M$.... ;-) but I reckon you'd have guessed this yourself. Breen's 1994 Asterisque volume may be useful here. | |
| Jun 30, 2011 at 22:35 | history | asked | André Henriques | CC BY-SA 3.0 |