Timeline for Lebesgue Riemann Theorem.

Current License: CC BY-SA 3.0

15 events

when toggle format	what		by	license	comment
Sep 5, 2013 at 17:41	history	edited	Pietro Majer	CC BY-SA 3.0	added 1 characters in body
Jun 28, 2011 at 13:00	history	edited	Pietro Majer	CC BY-SA 3.0	edited body
Jun 28, 2011 at 12:46	history	edited	Pietro Majer	CC BY-SA 3.0	added 119 characters in body
Jun 28, 2011 at 12:14	comment	added	Gerald Edgar		He's asking for a published reference, is that too much?
Jun 28, 2011 at 12:14	history	edited	Pietro Majer	CC BY-SA 3.0	added 15 characters in body
Jun 28, 2011 at 10:40	history	edited	Pietro Majer	CC BY-SA 3.0	added 87 characters in body
Jun 28, 2011 at 9:48	history	edited	Pietro Majer	CC BY-SA 3.0	added 35 characters in body; added 1 characters in body
Jun 28, 2011 at 9:44	comment	added	Pietro Majer		here's a nice on-line reference: mathoverflow.net/questions/68922/lebesgue-riemann-theorem/…
Jun 28, 2011 at 9:42	history	edited	Pietro Majer	CC BY-SA 3.0	added 1956 characters in body
Jun 28, 2011 at 5:55	comment	added	Alan		I still would like a refernce for this theorem, cause I am not sure I understand your argument with the inequality. Thanks.
Jun 27, 2011 at 16:39	comment	added	Pietro Majer		actually the last proposition (w* convergence in $L^\infty$ for $p=\infty$) is already included; it just comes to the $\\|\cdot \\|_1$ density of $C^0(M)$ in $L^1(M)$ (the pre-dual)
Jun 27, 2011 at 15:57	comment	added	Mark		OK, they definitely don't dance, but I meant to say that they are dense.
Jun 27, 2011 at 15:56	comment	added	Mark		They are dance if you take the weak-* topology on $L^\infty$, which gives the latter proposition.
Jun 27, 2011 at 15:50	history	edited	Pietro Majer	CC BY-SA 3.0	added 132 characters in body
Jun 27, 2011 at 15:19	history	answered	Pietro Majer	CC BY-SA 3.0