Skip to main content
http -> https (the question was bumped anyway)
Source Link
Martin Sleziak
  • 4.7k
  • 4
  • 35
  • 40

The explicit formula for cup product on group cohomology is as simple as can be. For simplicity let's consider integer coefficients $H^*(G;\mathbb{Z})$, although this works for any coefficients as long as they're untwisted.

Let's define group cohomology using inhomogeneous cochains; thus we take the abelian groups $C^n(G;\mathbb{Z}) :=$ functions from $G^n$ to $\mathbb{Z}$, endowed with a differential $d: C^n \to C^{n+1}$, and then $H^n(G;\mathbb{Z})$ is the usual cohomology $\ker d_n/\operatorname{im} d_{n-1}$.

Anyway, cup product is a map from $H^k(G) \otimes H^m(G)$ to $H^{k+m}(G)$, and it comes from a map $C^k(G) \otimes C^m(G)$ to $C^{k+m}(G)$. Namely, given two cochains $f: G^n \to \mathbb{Z}$ and $g: G^m \to \mathbb{Z}$, define

$$ f \wedge g: G^{k+m} \to \mathbb{Z} $$ by

$$ f\wedge g(x_1,...x_{k+m}) = f(x_1,...x_k)g(x_{k+1},...x_{k+m}) $$

You can check by hand that the differential interacts with this operation by

$$ d(f \wedge g) = df \wedge g + (-1)^k f \wedge dg $$

Thus this "wedge product" of cochains descends to a product on group cohomology, and this is exactly cup product. This is also how cup product is defined for de Rham cohomology; differential forms have a natural wedge productwedge product which satisfies $d(f \wedge g) = df \wedge g + (-1)^k f \wedge dg$, and so this induces the cup product on $H^*(M;R)$.

Topologically, cup product is the composition of

$$ H^k(Y) \otimes H^m(Y) \to H^{k+m}(Y \times Y) \to H^{k+m}(Y) $$

where the first map is the Kunneth map (just pullback by the two projections $Y \times Y \to Y$), and the second map is restriction to the diagonal. Applying this perspective to group cohomology, we would first define $f \times g : (G \times G)^{k+m} \to \mathbb{Z}$ by

$$ f \times g ((x_1,y_1),...(x_{k+m},y_{k+m})) = f(x_1,...x_k)g(y_{k+1},...,y_{k+m}). $$

Upon restriction to the diagonal $G < G \times G$, $f \times g$ restricts to $f \wedge g$ above.

The explicit formula for cup product on group cohomology is as simple as can be. For simplicity let's consider integer coefficients $H^*(G;\mathbb{Z})$, although this works for any coefficients as long as they're untwisted.

Let's define group cohomology using inhomogeneous cochains; thus we take the abelian groups $C^n(G;\mathbb{Z}) :=$ functions from $G^n$ to $\mathbb{Z}$, endowed with a differential $d: C^n \to C^{n+1}$, and then $H^n(G;\mathbb{Z})$ is the usual cohomology $\ker d_n/\operatorname{im} d_{n-1}$.

Anyway, cup product is a map from $H^k(G) \otimes H^m(G)$ to $H^{k+m}(G)$, and it comes from a map $C^k(G) \otimes C^m(G)$ to $C^{k+m}(G)$. Namely, given two cochains $f: G^n \to \mathbb{Z}$ and $g: G^m \to \mathbb{Z}$, define

$$ f \wedge g: G^{k+m} \to \mathbb{Z} $$ by

$$ f\wedge g(x_1,...x_{k+m}) = f(x_1,...x_k)g(x_{k+1},...x_{k+m}) $$

You can check by hand that the differential interacts with this operation by

$$ d(f \wedge g) = df \wedge g + (-1)^k f \wedge dg $$

Thus this "wedge product" of cochains descends to a product on group cohomology, and this is exactly cup product. This is also how cup product is defined for de Rham cohomology; differential forms have a natural wedge product which satisfies $d(f \wedge g) = df \wedge g + (-1)^k f \wedge dg$, and so this induces the cup product on $H^*(M;R)$.

Topologically, cup product is the composition of

$$ H^k(Y) \otimes H^m(Y) \to H^{k+m}(Y \times Y) \to H^{k+m}(Y) $$

where the first map is the Kunneth map (just pullback by the two projections $Y \times Y \to Y$), and the second map is restriction to the diagonal. Applying this perspective to group cohomology, we would first define $f \times g : (G \times G)^{k+m} \to \mathbb{Z}$ by

$$ f \times g ((x_1,y_1),...(x_{k+m},y_{k+m})) = f(x_1,...x_k)g(y_{k+1},...,y_{k+m}). $$

Upon restriction to the diagonal $G < G \times G$, $f \times g$ restricts to $f \wedge g$ above.

The explicit formula for cup product on group cohomology is as simple as can be. For simplicity let's consider integer coefficients $H^*(G;\mathbb{Z})$, although this works for any coefficients as long as they're untwisted.

Let's define group cohomology using inhomogeneous cochains; thus we take the abelian groups $C^n(G;\mathbb{Z}) :=$ functions from $G^n$ to $\mathbb{Z}$, endowed with a differential $d: C^n \to C^{n+1}$, and then $H^n(G;\mathbb{Z})$ is the usual cohomology $\ker d_n/\operatorname{im} d_{n-1}$.

Anyway, cup product is a map from $H^k(G) \otimes H^m(G)$ to $H^{k+m}(G)$, and it comes from a map $C^k(G) \otimes C^m(G)$ to $C^{k+m}(G)$. Namely, given two cochains $f: G^n \to \mathbb{Z}$ and $g: G^m \to \mathbb{Z}$, define

$$ f \wedge g: G^{k+m} \to \mathbb{Z} $$ by

$$ f\wedge g(x_1,...x_{k+m}) = f(x_1,...x_k)g(x_{k+1},...x_{k+m}) $$

You can check by hand that the differential interacts with this operation by

$$ d(f \wedge g) = df \wedge g + (-1)^k f \wedge dg $$

Thus this "wedge product" of cochains descends to a product on group cohomology, and this is exactly cup product. This is also how cup product is defined for de Rham cohomology; differential forms have a natural wedge product which satisfies $d(f \wedge g) = df \wedge g + (-1)^k f \wedge dg$, and so this induces the cup product on $H^*(M;R)$.

Topologically, cup product is the composition of

$$ H^k(Y) \otimes H^m(Y) \to H^{k+m}(Y \times Y) \to H^{k+m}(Y) $$

where the first map is the Kunneth map (just pullback by the two projections $Y \times Y \to Y$), and the second map is restriction to the diagonal. Applying this perspective to group cohomology, we would first define $f \times g : (G \times G)^{k+m} \to \mathbb{Z}$ by

$$ f \times g ((x_1,y_1),...(x_{k+m},y_{k+m})) = f(x_1,...x_k)g(y_{k+1},...,y_{k+m}). $$

Upon restriction to the diagonal $G < G \times G$, $f \times g$ restricts to $f \wedge g$ above.

The explicit formula for cup product on group cohomology is as simple as can be. For simplicity let's consider integer coefficients H*(G;Z)$H^*(G;\mathbb{Z})$, although this works for any coefficients as long as they're untwisted.

Let's define group cohomology using inhomogeneous cochains; thus we take the abelian groups Cn(G;Z) :=$C^n(G;\mathbb{Z}) :=$ functions from Gn$G^n$ to Z$\mathbb{Z}$, endowed with a differential d: Cn -> Cn+1$d: C^n \to C^{n+1}$, and then Hn(G;Z)$H^n(G;\mathbb{Z})$ is the usual cohomology ker dn/im d_n-1$\ker d_n/\operatorname{im} d_{n-1}$.

Anyway, cup product is a map from Hk(G) tensor Hm(G)$H^k(G) \otimes H^m(G)$ to Hk+m(G)$H^{k+m}(G)$, and it comes from a map Ck(G) tensor Cm(G)$C^k(G) \otimes C^m(G)$ to Ck+m(G)$C^{k+m}(G)$. Namely, given two cochains f: Gn -> Z$f: G^n \to \mathbb{Z}$ and g: Gm -> Z$g: G^m \to \mathbb{Z}$, define

f/\g: Gk+m -> Z

by$$ f \wedge g: G^{k+m} \to \mathbb{Z} $$ by

f/\g(x1,...xk+m) = f(x1,...xk)g(xk+1,...xk+m)$$ f\wedge g(x_1,...x_{k+m}) = f(x_1,...x_k)g(x_{k+1},...x_{k+m}) $$

You can check by hand that the differential interacts with this operation by

d(f/\g) = df/\g + (-1)k f/\dg$$ d(f \wedge g) = df \wedge g + (-1)^k f \wedge dg $$

Thus this "wedge product" of cochains descends to a product on group cohomology, and this is exactly cup product. This is also how cup product is defined for de Rham cohomology; differential forms have a natural wedge product which satisfies d(f/\g) = df/\g + (-1)k f/\dg$d(f \wedge g) = df \wedge g + (-1)^k f \wedge dg$, and so this induces the cup product on H*(M;R)$H^*(M;R)$.

Topologically, cup product is the composition of

Hk(Y) tensor Hm(Y) -> Hk+m(Y x Y) -> Hk+m(Y)$$ H^k(Y) \otimes H^m(Y) \to H^{k+m}(Y \times Y) \to H^{k+m}(Y) $$

where the first map is the Kunneth map (just pullback by the two projections Y x Y -> Y$Y \times Y \to Y$), and the second map is restriction to the diagonal. Applying this perspective to group cohomology, we would first define f x g : (GxG)k+m -> Z$f \times g : (G \times G)^{k+m} \to \mathbb{Z}$ by

f x g ((x1,y1),...(xk+m,yk+m)) = f(x1,...xk)g(yk+1,...,yk+m).$$ f \times g ((x_1,y_1),...(x_{k+m},y_{k+m})) = f(x_1,...x_k)g(y_{k+1},...,y_{k+m}). $$

Upon restriction to the diagonal G < G x G$G < G \times G$, f x g$f \times g$ restricts to f /\ g$f \wedge g$ above.

The explicit formula for cup product on group cohomology is as simple as can be. For simplicity let's consider integer coefficients H*(G;Z), although this works for any coefficients as long as they're untwisted.

Let's define group cohomology using inhomogeneous cochains; thus we take the abelian groups Cn(G;Z) := functions from Gn to Z, endowed with a differential d: Cn -> Cn+1, and then Hn(G;Z) is the usual cohomology ker dn/im d_n-1.

Anyway, cup product is a map from Hk(G) tensor Hm(G) to Hk+m(G), and it comes from a map Ck(G) tensor Cm(G) to Ck+m(G). Namely, given two cochains f: Gn -> Z and g: Gm -> Z, define

f/\g: Gk+m -> Z

by

f/\g(x1,...xk+m) = f(x1,...xk)g(xk+1,...xk+m)

You can check by hand that the differential interacts with this operation by

d(f/\g) = df/\g + (-1)k f/\dg

Thus this "wedge product" of cochains descends to a product on group cohomology, and this is exactly cup product. This is also how cup product is defined for de Rham cohomology; differential forms have a natural wedge product which satisfies d(f/\g) = df/\g + (-1)k f/\dg, and so this induces the cup product on H*(M;R).

Topologically, cup product is the composition of

Hk(Y) tensor Hm(Y) -> Hk+m(Y x Y) -> Hk+m(Y)

where the first map is the Kunneth map (just pullback by the two projections Y x Y -> Y), and the second map is restriction to the diagonal. Applying this perspective to group cohomology, we would first define f x g : (GxG)k+m -> Z by

f x g ((x1,y1),...(xk+m,yk+m)) = f(x1,...xk)g(yk+1,...,yk+m).

Upon restriction to the diagonal G < G x G, f x g restricts to f /\ g above.

The explicit formula for cup product on group cohomology is as simple as can be. For simplicity let's consider integer coefficients $H^*(G;\mathbb{Z})$, although this works for any coefficients as long as they're untwisted.

Let's define group cohomology using inhomogeneous cochains; thus we take the abelian groups $C^n(G;\mathbb{Z}) :=$ functions from $G^n$ to $\mathbb{Z}$, endowed with a differential $d: C^n \to C^{n+1}$, and then $H^n(G;\mathbb{Z})$ is the usual cohomology $\ker d_n/\operatorname{im} d_{n-1}$.

Anyway, cup product is a map from $H^k(G) \otimes H^m(G)$ to $H^{k+m}(G)$, and it comes from a map $C^k(G) \otimes C^m(G)$ to $C^{k+m}(G)$. Namely, given two cochains $f: G^n \to \mathbb{Z}$ and $g: G^m \to \mathbb{Z}$, define

$$ f \wedge g: G^{k+m} \to \mathbb{Z} $$ by

$$ f\wedge g(x_1,...x_{k+m}) = f(x_1,...x_k)g(x_{k+1},...x_{k+m}) $$

You can check by hand that the differential interacts with this operation by

$$ d(f \wedge g) = df \wedge g + (-1)^k f \wedge dg $$

Thus this "wedge product" of cochains descends to a product on group cohomology, and this is exactly cup product. This is also how cup product is defined for de Rham cohomology; differential forms have a natural wedge product which satisfies $d(f \wedge g) = df \wedge g + (-1)^k f \wedge dg$, and so this induces the cup product on $H^*(M;R)$.

Topologically, cup product is the composition of

$$ H^k(Y) \otimes H^m(Y) \to H^{k+m}(Y \times Y) \to H^{k+m}(Y) $$

where the first map is the Kunneth map (just pullback by the two projections $Y \times Y \to Y$), and the second map is restriction to the diagonal. Applying this perspective to group cohomology, we would first define $f \times g : (G \times G)^{k+m} \to \mathbb{Z}$ by

$$ f \times g ((x_1,y_1),...(x_{k+m},y_{k+m})) = f(x_1,...x_k)g(y_{k+1},...,y_{k+m}). $$

Upon restriction to the diagonal $G < G \times G$, $f \times g$ restricts to $f \wedge g$ above.

added 383 characters in body
Source Link
Tom Church
  • 8.2k
  • 1
  • 41
  • 51

The explicit formula for cup product on group cohomology is as simple as can be. For simplicity let's consider integer coefficients H^*H*(G;Z), although this works for any coefficients as long as they're untwisted.

Let's define group cohomology using inhomogeneous cochains; thus we take the abelian groups C^nCn(G;Z) =:= functions from G^nGn to Z, endow themendowed with a differential d: C^nCn -> C^n+1Cn+1, and then H^nHn(G;Z) is the usual cohomology ker d_ ndn/im d_n-1d_n-1.

Anyway, cup product is a map from H^kHk(G) tensor H^mHm(G) to H^k+mHk+m(G), and it comes from a map C^kCk(G) tensor C^mCm(G) to C^k+mCk+m(G). Namely, given two cochains f: G^nGn -> Z and g: G^mGm -> Z, define

f/\g: G^k+m -> Z

f/\g: Gk+m -> Z

f/\g(x_1,...x_k+m) = f(x_1,...x_k)g(x_k+1,...x_k+m)

f/\g(x1,...xk+m) = f(x1,...xk)g(xk+1,...xk+m)

You can check by hand that the differential interacts with this operation by

d(f/\g) = df/\g + (-1)^k f/\dg

d(f/\g) = df/\g + (-1)k f/\dg

Thus this "wedge product" of cochains descends to a product on group cohomology, and this is exactly cup product. This is also how cup product is defined for de Rham cohomology; differential forms have a natural wedge product which satisfies d(f/\g) = df/\g + (-1)^kk f/\dg, and so this induces the cup product on H^*H*(M;R).

H^k(Y) tensor H^m(Y) -> H^k+m(Y x Y) -> H^k+m(Y)

Hk(Y) tensor Hm(Y) -> Hk+m(Y x Y) -> Hk+m(Y)

where the first map is the Kunneth map (just pullback by the two projections from Y x Y -> Y), and the second map is restriction to the diagonal. TakingApplying this perspective onto group cohomology, we would first define f x g : (GxG)^k+mk+m -> Z by

f x g ((x_1,y_1),...(x_k+m,y_k+m)) = f(x_1,...x_k)g(y_,...,y_k+m).

f x g ((x1,y1),...(xk+m,yk+m)) = f(x1,...xk)g(yk+1,...,yk+m).

The explicit formula for cup product on group cohomology is as simple as can be. For simplicity let's consider integer coefficients H^*(G;Z), although this works for any coefficients as long as they're untwisted.

Let's define group cohomology using inhomogeneous cochains; thus we take the abelian groups C^n(G;Z) = functions from G^n to Z, endow them with a differential d: C^n -> C^n+1, and then H^n(G;Z) is the usual cohomology ker d_ n/im d_n-1.

Anyway, cup product is a map from H^k(G) tensor H^m(G) to H^k+m(G), and it comes from a map C^k(G) tensor C^m(G) to C^k+m(G). Namely, given two cochains f: G^n -> Z and g: G^m -> Z, define

f/\g: G^k+m -> Z
f/\g(x_1,...x_k+m) = f(x_1,...x_k)g(x_k+1,...x_k+m)

You can check that the differential interacts with this operation by

d(f/\g) = df/\g + (-1)^k f/\dg

Thus this "wedge product" of cochains descends to a product on group cohomology, and this is exactly cup product. This is also how cup product is defined for de Rham cohomology; differential forms have a natural wedge product which satisfies d(f/\g) = df/\g + (-1)^k f/\dg, and so this induces the cup product on H^*(M;R).

H^k(Y) tensor H^m(Y) -> H^k+m(Y x Y) -> H^k+m(Y)

where the first map is the Kunneth map (just pullback by the two projections from Y x Y -> Y), and the second map is restriction to the diagonal. Taking this perspective on group cohomology, we would first define f x g : (GxG)^k+m -> Z by

f x g ((x_1,y_1),...(x_k+m,y_k+m)) = f(x_1,...x_k)g(y_,...,y_k+m).

The explicit formula for cup product on group cohomology is as simple as can be. For simplicity let's consider integer coefficients H*(G;Z), although this works for any coefficients as long as they're untwisted.

Let's define group cohomology using inhomogeneous cochains; thus we take the abelian groups Cn(G;Z) := functions from Gn to Z, endowed with a differential d: Cn -> Cn+1, and then Hn(G;Z) is the usual cohomology ker dn/im d_n-1.

Anyway, cup product is a map from Hk(G) tensor Hm(G) to Hk+m(G), and it comes from a map Ck(G) tensor Cm(G) to Ck+m(G). Namely, given two cochains f: Gn -> Z and g: Gm -> Z, define

f/\g: Gk+m -> Z

f/\g(x1,...xk+m) = f(x1,...xk)g(xk+1,...xk+m)

You can check by hand that the differential interacts with this operation by

d(f/\g) = df/\g + (-1)k f/\dg

Thus this "wedge product" of cochains descends to a product on group cohomology, and this is exactly cup product. This is also how cup product is defined for de Rham cohomology; differential forms have a natural wedge product which satisfies d(f/\g) = df/\g + (-1)k f/\dg, and so this induces the cup product on H*(M;R).

Hk(Y) tensor Hm(Y) -> Hk+m(Y x Y) -> Hk+m(Y)

where the first map is the Kunneth map (just pullback by the two projections Y x Y -> Y), and the second map is restriction to the diagonal. Applying this perspective to group cohomology, we would first define f x g : (GxG)k+m -> Z by

f x g ((x1,y1),...(xk+m,yk+m)) = f(x1,...xk)g(yk+1,...,yk+m).

Source Link
Tom Church
  • 8.2k
  • 1
  • 41
  • 51
Loading