Skip to main content
added 1 characters in body
Source Link

The properties of binary relations such as reflexivity, symmetry, transitivity are ubiquitous. What about ternary relations, whatwhich properties can we consider fundamental? For motivation here is the one that looks like generalized transitivity:

R(e,a,b) & R(d,e,c) & R(f,b,c) -> R(d,a,f)

This is a well known algebraic law disguised in relational notation (which one?-).

The properties of binary relations such as reflexivity, symmetry, transitivity are ubiquitous. What about ternary relations, what properties can we consider fundamental? For motivation here is the one that looks like generalized transitivity:

R(e,a,b) & R(d,e,c) & R(f,b,c) -> R(d,a,f)

This is a well known algebraic law disguised in relational notation (which one?-).

The properties of binary relations such as reflexivity, symmetry, transitivity are ubiquitous. What about ternary relations, which properties can we consider fundamental? For motivation here is the one that looks like generalized transitivity:

R(e,a,b) & R(d,e,c) & R(f,b,c) -> R(d,a,f)

This is a well known algebraic law disguised in relational notation (which one?-).

Source Link

Generalization of binary relation properties to ternary relations

The properties of binary relations such as reflexivity, symmetry, transitivity are ubiquitous. What about ternary relations, what properties can we consider fundamental? For motivation here is the one that looks like generalized transitivity:

R(e,a,b) & R(d,e,c) & R(f,b,c) -> R(d,a,f)

This is a well known algebraic law disguised in relational notation (which one?-).