Timeline for Do all finite $W$-superalgebras have 1-dimensional representations?
Current License: CC BY-SA 3.0
9 events
when toggle format | what | by | license | comment | |
---|---|---|---|---|---|
Jun 27, 2011 at 18:31 | comment | added | José Figueroa-O'Farrill | @wison: no problem and thanks for the edit. Let me just emphasise that Tjark's paper, despite being published in a Physics journal, is actually reasonably mathematical. He considers an important special case of what are now known as finite W-algebras. | |
Jun 19, 2011 at 22:57 | history | edited | Ben Webster♦ | CC BY-SA 3.0 |
edited title
|
Jun 19, 2011 at 13:01 | history | edited | wison | CC BY-SA 3.0 |
added 10 characters in body
|
Jun 19, 2011 at 12:48 | comment | added | wison | @José Figueroa-O'Farrill , thank you very much. I apologize for inadequate references in this regard. I just want to say the finite $W$-algebras were introduced by Premet into mathematics in a different terminology. | |
Jun 19, 2011 at 12:41 | history | edited | wison | CC BY-SA 3.0 |
added 247 characters in body
|
Jun 19, 2011 at 11:47 | comment | added | José Figueroa-O'Farrill | Not to take any credit away from Premet, but finite W-algebras were introduced by Tjark Tjin in a 1992 paper of that name, published in Phys. Lett. B292, 60 (1992). (ams.org/mathscinet-getitem?mr=1184379) | |
Jun 19, 2011 at 11:30 | history | edited | wison | CC BY-SA 3.0 |
deleted 114 characters in body
|
Jun 19, 2011 at 5:44 | history | edited | wison | CC BY-SA 3.0 |
added 3 characters in body
|
Jun 19, 2011 at 5:39 | history | asked | wison | CC BY-SA 3.0 |