Timeline for An identity involving the Drazin inverse
Current License: CC BY-SA 3.0
4 events
| when toggle format | what | by | license | comment | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Jun 21, 2011 at 0:19 | comment | added | Suvrit | Given the relation to $1/z$, it seems that for being viewed as a matrix function, the Drazin inverse seems to be the correct object. I did not previously know of this nice relation. | |
| Jun 20, 2011 at 23:36 | vote | accept | Glynne | ||
| Jun 20, 2011 at 23:36 | comment | added | Glynne | Thanks. The relationship does not hold (in general) for either the Moore-Penrose inverse or the regular matrix inverse. I assume that's because of those $zero$ eigenvalues? | |
| Jun 19, 2011 at 1:35 | history | answered | Suvrit | CC BY-SA 3.0 |