Timeline for Periods and L-values of modular forms
Current License: CC BY-SA 3.0
6 events
| when toggle format | what | by | license | comment | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Aug 24, 2011 at 14:42 | comment | added | Rob Harron | They certainly are not! That's a big problem with the periods of modular forms as opposed to those of elliptic curves. There has however been progress in writing down periods that canonically vary in $p$-adic families, so that one can take about congruences and $\mu$-invariants of $p$-adic $L$-functions. This is what the papers of Vatsal and Emerton–Pollack–Weston discuss. | |
| Aug 24, 2011 at 6:39 | comment | added | David Hansen | Re. update: Those periods don't seem very canonical, depending as they do on an arbitrary choice of twisting character. | |
| Aug 24, 2011 at 5:23 | history | edited | Rob Harron | CC BY-SA 3.0 |
add: weight 2 case still conditional in 1976 paper
|
| Aug 24, 2011 at 5:04 | history | edited | Rob Harron | CC BY-SA 3.0 |
add ref to Shimura for exact statement you're looking for
|
| Jun 18, 2011 at 17:34 | vote | accept | David Loeffler | ||
| Jun 18, 2011 at 17:14 | history | answered | Rob Harron | CC BY-SA 3.0 |