Timeline for Element in the absolute Galois group of the rationals
Current License: CC BY-SA 2.5
4 events
| when toggle format | what | by | license | comment | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Apr 13, 2017 at 12:58 | history | edited | CommunityBot |
replaced http://mathoverflow.net/ with https://mathoverflow.net/
|
|
| Nov 25, 2009 at 13:30 | comment | added | Harrison Brown | Well, if you only care about them up to conjugacy, I suppose you could look at Galois representations of this group, about which some nontrivial things are in fact known, although I don't claim to understand it. | |
| Nov 25, 2009 at 13:25 | comment | added | Lior Bary-Soroker | I read this answer, and it's fine with me to find elements up to conjugation. Both the complex conjugation and the `local elements' coming from local fields are defined up to conjugation. | |
| Nov 25, 2009 at 13:14 | history | answered | Harrison Brown | CC BY-SA 2.5 |