Timeline for Why does one consider the dual of the Steenrod algebra?
Current License: CC BY-SA 3.0
5 events
| when toggle format | what | by | license | comment | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Mar 24, 2016 at 10:07 | comment | added | მამუკა ჯიბლაძე | @AndréHenriques ...however (as I found later) there are some relevant references and further information in a 2006 MPI preprint by Lebedev and Leites | |
| Mar 20, 2016 at 20:17 | comment | added | მამუკა ჯიბლაძე | @AndréHenriques Only saw your comment now. There is an appendix by Buchstaber to the russian translation of Steenrod - Epstein, where he does this description (the title translates as "The Steenrod algebra - the enveloping algebra of the supergroup of $p$-adic diffeomorphisms of the line"). Unfortunately I am not aware of any version of this text in english. | |
| Jun 18, 2011 at 5:22 | comment | added | André Henriques | @Eric: Can you be more precise please. I guess the supergroup is $Spec(H^*(B\mathbb Z/p\mathbb Z;\mathbb F_p))$. But what replaces "strict"? Can it be phrased in purely (super-)geometric language? | |
| Jun 14, 2011 at 8:31 | comment | added | Eric Peterson | There is also a statement for the whole odd primary Steenrod algebra, if you enlarge to thinking about a formal completion of an additive supergroup. | |
| Jun 14, 2011 at 5:36 | history | answered | John Palmieri | CC BY-SA 3.0 |