Timeline for What is a cohomology theory (seriously)?
Current License: CC BY-SA 4.0
8 events
| when toggle format | what | by | license | comment | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Apr 12, 2023 at 8:11 | comment | added | Martin Sleziak | The link in the first comment by @user717 no longer works - but the text can still be found using the Wayback Machine. The title is: Questions and speculation on cohomology theoriesin arithmetic geometry. Version 1. | |
| S Nov 21, 2019 at 3:53 | history | suggested | Dat Minh Ha | CC BY-SA 4.0 |
Reformatted symbols with LaTeX for ease of reading.
|
| Nov 21, 2019 at 2:29 | review | Suggested edits | |||
| S Nov 21, 2019 at 3:53 | |||||
| Aug 14, 2019 at 15:48 | review | Suggested edits | |||
| Aug 14, 2019 at 16:22 | |||||
| Sep 23, 2010 at 21:38 | comment | added | Tim Campion | +1 for a cool story. | |
| Dec 15, 2009 at 2:26 | comment | added | Andreas Holmstrom | I wrote a blog post about the difference between generalized and ordinary cohomology in algebraic geometry - it doesn't answer your question but maybe you find it interesting. homotopical.wordpress.com/2009/12/10/… | |
| Nov 25, 2009 at 13:44 | comment | added | user717 | Amazing, although I don't really know what to do with this (\infty,1)-stuff...I remember reading your notes/thoughts/questions (andreasholmstrom.org/research/Cohomology1.pdf) some time ago and I was happy that indeed people are thinking about these questions (people always tell me that I'm crazy when I ask such questions!). So, I'm looking forward to whatever you will add to your comment :) | |
| Nov 25, 2009 at 3:00 | history | answered | Andreas Holmstrom | CC BY-SA 2.5 |