Timeline for Finite T-uples and the axiom of Regularity
Current License: CC BY-SA 3.0
5 events
| when toggle format | what | by | license | comment | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Jun 9, 2011 at 18:44 | vote | accept | Gérard Lang | ||
| Jun 12, 2011 at 18:28 | |||||
| Jun 9, 2011 at 2:01 | comment | added | Joel David Hamkins | Yes, I had meant what I wrote originally, since that is how I had conceived it, but your correction is also true, since x={x} anyway. So it doesn't matter! Indeed, we can nest in a few more layers of braces and it would be the same set! | |
| Jun 9, 2011 at 1:53 | comment | added | François G. Dorais | Oups! I made a small correction, but I now think you meant what you originally wrote... | |
| Jun 9, 2011 at 1:49 | history | edited | François G. Dorais | CC BY-SA 3.0 |
minor correction
|
| Jun 8, 2011 at 22:58 | history | answered | Joel David Hamkins | CC BY-SA 3.0 |