Timeline for Finite T-uples and the axiom of Regularity
Current License: CC BY-SA 3.0
13 events
when toggle format | what | by | license | comment | |
---|---|---|---|---|---|
Jun 12, 2011 at 18:28 | vote | accept | Gérard Lang | ||
Jun 9, 2011 at 18:44 | vote | accept | Gérard Lang | ||
Jun 12, 2011 at 18:28 | |||||
Jun 9, 2011 at 18:44 | vote | accept | Gérard Lang | ||
Jun 9, 2011 at 18:44 | |||||
Jun 9, 2011 at 16:19 | answer | added | Ali Enayat | timeline score: 4 | |
Jun 9, 2011 at 0:19 | history | edited | Gerry Myerson |
edited tags
|
|
Jun 8, 2011 at 23:00 | comment | added | Joel David Hamkins | Also, typo in question (3), since you mean to suppose there that the answer to question (2) is No. | |
Jun 8, 2011 at 22:58 | answer | added | Joel David Hamkins | timeline score: 3 | |
Jun 8, 2011 at 22:45 | comment | added | Joel David Hamkins | Gerard, I think you have a typo in the statement of (T), since you want x to be in a unique $T(n)$ rather than $U(n)$. (Also, the tag should be "set-theory", not "set" plus "theory". | |
Jun 8, 2011 at 22:45 | comment | added | Gérard Lang | I thought that VV would be the subclass of V containing all sets that are considered as ordered pairs, so that the singleton of x that can be considered as a pair, but not as an ordered pair (or couple) is a member of V, but not of VV. Gérard Lang | |
Jun 8, 2011 at 22:18 | comment | added | Kevin Buzzard | I think the way I was brought up, $V*V$ would come out to be $V$ again... | |
Jun 8, 2011 at 22:17 | comment | added | Gérard Lang | YES, I mean T(n)=U(n)-U(n+1); thank you very much ! I suspected the answers could depend of how to define ordered pairs, but was not able to clearly see that. So let's say we choose the classical Kuratowski (1921) definition; but the choice of the wiener definition (1914) should also be interesting. GL | |
Jun 8, 2011 at 22:11 | comment | added | Joel David Hamkins | Do you mean $T(n)=U(n)-U(n+1)$? Also, you haven't specified which encoding of ordered pairs you are using, but it would seem the answer might depend on it. | |
Jun 8, 2011 at 21:26 | history | asked | Gérard Lang | CC BY-SA 3.0 |