Skip to main content
10 events
when toggle format what by license comment
Jun 7, 2011 at 18:39 comment added Dror Speiser Oh yes! Thanks David. I've looked at too many quadratic imaginary fields lately that I forgot that units with negative norm can even exist...
Jun 7, 2011 at 18:12 vote accept Tom Hunt
Jun 7, 2011 at 15:45 comment added David Loeffler Dror: You have to restrict to norm 1 units, cf. my answer below, which crossed over with yours.
Jun 7, 2011 at 15:43 answer added David Loeffler timeline score: 6
Jun 7, 2011 at 15:36 history edited Tom Hunt CC BY-SA 3.0
I changed my initial statement to reflect the comment of David.; added 2 characters in body
Jun 7, 2011 at 15:29 comment added Dror Speiser In your example $1,\theta,\theta^2$ generate the maximal order, so the equation is simply the norm equation whose solutions are exactly the units of the field generated by $\theta$. The field is totally real, hence has unit rank 2, and the group of units is generated by: {$-1,\theta+1,\theta^2-1$}. So the solutions are those such that $p+q\theta+r\theta^2=\pm (\theta+1)^a(\theta^2-1)^b$, for any integers $a,b$. (all computations were done using Sage)
Jun 7, 2011 at 15:10 comment added Tom Hunt David, thank you for your reply. Indeed your restatement of the problem is correct. It may be less difficult than the problem he tries to solve. I looked at Mordell's particular solution as only a particular solution to my problem.
Jun 7, 2011 at 14:54 history edited Tom Hunt CC BY-SA 3.0
fixed typo: changed indecies on the left hand side of particular solutions.
Jun 7, 2011 at 14:25 comment added David Loeffler So: you want to find all triples $(x, y, z)$ of integers such that $\prod_{\theta} (x + y\theta + z \theta^2) = 1$, where $\theta$ runs through the solutions to your cubic? (I think Mordell is trying to do something else much harder -- for him w is not part of the question; he's solving for the quadruple $(x, y, z, w)$.)
Jun 7, 2011 at 12:39 history asked Tom Hunt CC BY-SA 3.0