Timeline for Ramanujan's eccentric Integral formula
Current License: CC BY-SA 3.0
18 events
| when toggle format | what | by | license | comment | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Apr 14, 2017 at 7:35 | answer | added | Zurab Silagadze | timeline score: 9 | |
| Dec 12, 2013 at 4:03 | review | Suggested edits | |||
| Dec 12, 2013 at 9:45 | |||||
| Jul 30, 2011 at 11:09 | history | edited | C.S. | CC BY-SA 3.0 |
an changed to a
|
| Jun 6, 2011 at 6:44 | history | edited | C.S. | CC BY-SA 3.0 |
TeX made small size
|
| Jun 5, 2011 at 4:10 | answer | added | David Hansen | timeline score: 13 | |
| Jun 4, 2011 at 23:54 | comment | added | Todd Trimble | David, I'd love it if you were to write up your comment as an answer! | |
| Jun 4, 2011 at 21:21 | history | edited | Andrey Rekalo | CC BY-SA 3.0 |
Typo in the formula, edited tags
|
| Jun 4, 2011 at 19:38 | vote | accept | C.S. | ||
| Jun 4, 2011 at 19:34 | vote | accept | C.S. | ||
| Jun 4, 2011 at 19:34 | |||||
| Jun 3, 2011 at 21:57 | comment | added | Marco Golla | As for your last question, this thread should be relevant: mathoverflow.net/questions/49866/… | |
| Jun 3, 2011 at 20:31 | answer | added | Andrey Rekalo | timeline score: 22 | |
| Jun 3, 2011 at 14:26 | comment | added | David Hansen | Believe it or not, the integrand is a quotient of products of $\Gamma$-functions, integrated over a vertical line in the complex plane, and the integral pops out after a clever use of the Plancherel theorem for Mellin transforms. | |
| Jun 3, 2011 at 13:57 | answer | added | Henry Cohn | timeline score: 17 | |
| Jun 3, 2011 at 12:23 | comment | added | Gerry Myerson | You've asked about the intuition behind Ramanujan's formulas before. I doubt you'll get a better answer this time, but maybe someone will prove me wrong. | |
| Jun 3, 2011 at 12:14 | comment | added | Suvrit | The formula you cite is incorrect; please double check--(b+1 in second term, instead of b+2) | |
| Jun 3, 2011 at 11:50 | comment | added | Charles Matthews | I think you should read up on Ramanujan some more. There is really not much percentage in taking a formula like this in isolation and brainstorming some queries about it. | |
| Jun 3, 2011 at 10:42 | comment | added | Andrey Rekalo | I really think you're asking three separate questions here. A split might not be such a bad idea. | |
| Jun 3, 2011 at 10:33 | history | asked | C.S. | CC BY-SA 3.0 |