Timeline for Ergodic Theorem and Nonstandard Analysis
Current License: CC BY-SA 3.0
8 events
| when toggle format | what | by | license | comment | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Jul 27, 2011 at 12:05 | vote | accept | Sonat Suer | ||
| Jul 24, 2011 at 6:12 | answer | added | Terry Tao | timeline score: 13 | |
| Jul 9, 2011 at 15:37 | comment | added | Martin Sleziak | As far as your last question is concerned, there is a related thread mathoverflow.net/questions/28997/… | |
| Jul 9, 2011 at 14:52 | answer | added | John Galt | timeline score: 0 | |
| Jun 2, 2011 at 5:25 | history | edited | Sonat Suer | CC BY-SA 3.0 |
edited body
|
| Jun 1, 2011 at 18:34 | comment | added | Michael Hardy | I would think if the limit above actually exists then for an infinite integer $n$, the standard part of the average of $n$ terms would be equal to the limit. If you can get this into a form where you've got $\sum_{j=1}^n \sum_{k=1}^m$ for infinite integers $n$ and $m$, where the thing being summed is standard (in the sense used in non-standard analysis) then you shouldn't even need Fubini's theorem. | |
| Jun 1, 2011 at 7:47 | history | edited | Sonat Suer | CC BY-SA 3.0 |
added 2 characters in body
|
| Jun 1, 2011 at 7:38 | history | asked | Sonat Suer | CC BY-SA 3.0 |