Timeline for Uniruled + Picard number 1 = Fano?
Current License: CC BY-SA 3.0
9 events
when toggle format | what | by | license | comment | |
---|---|---|---|---|---|
Jun 1, 2011 at 13:43 | history | edited | Francesco Polizzi | CC BY-SA 3.0 |
deleted 30 characters in body
|
Jun 1, 2011 at 7:07 | comment | added | Sándor Kovács | Yeah, I know. You can just replace $\mathrm{Pic}$ with $\mathrm{Num}$. | |
Jun 1, 2011 at 6:50 | comment | added | Francesco Polizzi | Sandor, of course you are right. I was thinking only about those divisor classes which are not numerically trivial. I will edit the answer, thank you. | |
Jun 1, 2011 at 6:48 | history | edited | Francesco Polizzi | CC BY-SA 3.0 |
added 43 characters in body
|
Jun 1, 2011 at 6:30 | comment | added | Sándor Kovács | Francesco, just to do a little bit of nitpicking, let me point out that the Picard number being $1$ does not imply that $\mathrm{Pic}X\simeq \mathbb Z$. In general there might be some torsion classes. Of course, this does not matter in your argument, and at the end $X$ is simply connected so there are actually no torsion classes, but I don't think this is clear a priori. Cheers. | |
May 31, 2011 at 18:20 | history | edited | Francesco Polizzi | CC BY-SA 3.0 |
added 19 characters in body
|
May 31, 2011 at 16:38 | history | edited | Francesco Polizzi | CC BY-SA 3.0 |
added 381 characters in body; added 13 characters in body; deleted 2 characters in body
|
May 31, 2011 at 16:30 | comment | added | naf | The canonical divisor could also be trivial (though of course this doesn't affect the argument). | |
May 31, 2011 at 16:25 | history | answered | Francesco Polizzi | CC BY-SA 3.0 |