Timeline for Appendices to papers authored by others
Current License: CC BY-SA 3.0
5 events
| when toggle format | what | by | license | comment | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| May 28, 2011 at 15:42 | comment | added | Thierry Zell | @Pasha: you did not address the issue of the inherently speculative nature of your last question, which is by far the most questionable part of the whole post as far as I am concerned. Different people have different reasons to write appendices, and I don't really care to know them. In many instances, you could make a good guess as to what the reason was anyway. | |
| May 28, 2011 at 11:38 | comment | added | user9072 | Pasha Zusmanovich, you can have a look at my answer to see a way how Thierry Zell's suggestion can be carried out at least to some extent in a really simple way within minutes. | |
| May 27, 2011 at 18:35 | comment | added | user9072 | +1 from me for the answer. And Pasha Zusmanovich, I don't like your tone. First, 'there is another way' does not really contradict the assertion 'there is a standard way'; the point is that being an author of the appendix doesn't make you an author of the paper, and this should be reflected in the bib-entry. And this issue is not so unique to appendices; you face related issues when quoting a book having an editor whose chapeters were written by different authors. | |
| May 27, 2011 at 14:04 | comment | added | Pasha Zusmanovich | 2. The top answer gives an example different from what you claim is a "standard way". 3. I don't see how that can be checked "easily" using a "database". Oh, I don't like your tone. | |
| May 27, 2011 at 12:36 | history | answered | Thierry Zell | CC BY-SA 3.0 |