Skip to main content
9 events
when toggle format what by license comment
Apr 23, 2016 at 9:11 history edited Sebastian Goette CC BY-SA 3.0
Spelling of Riemann
Jun 18, 2011 at 22:15 vote accept cduston
May 31, 2011 at 15:48 vote accept cduston
Jun 18, 2011 at 22:15
May 26, 2011 at 20:07 comment added cduston In fact it's pretty easy to use the Weierstrass formula to extend this idea to arbitrary surfaces...for instance see Friedrich J. Diff. Geom. 28 (1998). As far I understand it, they still need to be complex surfaces but the minimal condition can be dropped.
May 26, 2011 at 19:19 comment added Andy Putman The Weierstrass formula is for immersed minimal surfaces. The Riemann surface thing has nothing to do with your problem here -- there is no reason that an immersion of a PL or a smooth surface has to be minimal in any sense of the word.
May 26, 2011 at 19:09 comment added cduston Ok Ryan yes I think that is what I want to ask. Basically there nice ways to describe immersed Riemann surfaces (specifically, the Weierstrass formula), and I would like to describe immersed PL surfaces using the same techniques.
May 26, 2011 at 18:01 answer added Andy Putman timeline score: 6
May 26, 2011 at 17:40 comment added Ryan Budney Perhaps you mean to ask, "is there a canonical way to put the structure of a Riemann surface on a PL immersed surface?" Because a PL immersed surface isn't literally a Riemann surface in the sense of having a complex atlas.
May 26, 2011 at 17:31 history asked cduston CC BY-SA 3.0