Timeline for Convexity of $\frac{1}{2}\vert x_1 + x_2 + x_3 - x_1x_2x_3\vert^2$
Current License: CC BY-SA 3.0
11 events
| when toggle format | what | by | license | comment | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| May 26, 2011 at 16:27 | vote | accept | Will | ||
| May 26, 2011 at 14:53 | answer | added | Denis Serre | timeline score: 5 | |
| May 26, 2011 at 14:42 | comment | added | Theo Buehler | I fixed your arrays. You need to use triple backslashes \\\ instead of the usual double backslashes \\ because the backslashes are also escape characters here. | |
| May 26, 2011 at 14:42 | history | edited | Will | CC BY-SA 3.0 |
deleted 26 characters in body
|
| May 26, 2011 at 14:38 | history | edited | Theo Buehler | CC BY-SA 3.0 |
Fixed arrays
|
| May 26, 2011 at 14:27 | history | edited | Will | CC BY-SA 3.0 |
added 10 characters in body
|
| May 26, 2011 at 14:19 | comment | added | Will | Thanks - I removed the background info and tried to add the full expression for general N, but the LateX processing seems to fail on \array's? So there should be a newline between the $-x_N$ and the $x_N$, and also between the $-x_1$ and the $x_1$, and between the right 1 and 0. | |
| May 26, 2011 at 14:17 | history | edited | Will | CC BY-SA 3.0 |
added 175 characters in body; deleted 2 characters in body
|
| May 26, 2011 at 14:11 | comment | added | Todd Trimble | In order to attract more potential solvers (who are coming from pure mathematics), it would probably be better to cut back on the jargon, particularly all the initializations (e.g., NMR, RF, PSD -- I at any rate am not familiar with these). Also, you might as well specify the precise function for any N, rather than use the hand-waving "similar". | |
| May 26, 2011 at 13:47 | history | edited | Will | CC BY-SA 3.0 |
deleted 3 characters in body
|
| May 26, 2011 at 13:40 | history | asked | Will | CC BY-SA 3.0 |