Skip to main content
added 14 characters in body
Source Link
John D. Cook
  • 5.2k
  • 1
  • 48
  • 72

See Sets for Mathematics by Lawevere and Rosebrugh. Its a great book, but it is misnamed. It should have been called something like "An introduction to category theory via set theory." The point of the book really is category theory, not set theory.

See Sets for Mathematics by Lawevere. Its a great book, but it is misnamed. It should have been called something like "An introduction to category theory via set theory." The point of the book really is category theory, not set theory.

See Sets for Mathematics by Lawevere and Rosebrugh. Its a great book, but it is misnamed. It should have been called something like "An introduction to category theory via set theory." The point of the book really is category theory, not set theory.

Post Made Community Wiki
Source Link
John D. Cook
  • 5.2k
  • 1
  • 48
  • 72

See Sets for Mathematics by Lawevere. Its a great book, but it is misnamed. It should have been called something like "An introduction to category theory via set theory." The point of the book really is category theory, not set theory.