Skip to main content
formatting fix
Source Link
David Loeffler
  • 37k
  • 3
  • 89
  • 194

I guess $p=char(k)$$p=\operatorname{char}(k)$. For another (unified) proof of Tate's theorem (that works for primes $\ell\ne p$ and $\ell=p$) see arXiv:0711.1615[matharXiv:0711.1615 [math.AG]; MR2484084 (2010a:11117).

I guess $p=char(k)$. For another (unified) proof of Tate's theorem (that works for primes $\ell\ne p$ and $\ell=p$) see arXiv:0711.1615[math.AG]; MR2484084 (2010a:11117).

I guess $p=\operatorname{char}(k)$. For another (unified) proof of Tate's theorem (that works for primes $\ell\ne p$ and $\ell=p$) see arXiv:0711.1615 [math.AG]; MR2484084 (2010a:11117).

Source Link
Yuri Zarhin
  • 5.1k
  • 22
  • 31

I guess $p=char(k)$. For another (unified) proof of Tate's theorem (that works for primes $\ell\ne p$ and $\ell=p$) see arXiv:0711.1615[math.AG]; MR2484084 (2010a:11117).