Skip to main content
fixed broken links to springerlink.com, jmp.aip.org, ams.org, citebase.org; used the citation helper to consistently format all the citations
Source Link

Multiplet classification of highest weight modules over quantum universal enveloping algebras: the Uq(SL(3,C)) example in Groups St Andrews 1989 vol 1 LMS LNM #159

Representations of Quantum Groups, Symmetries in Science V (Lochau 1990), 93–135, Plenum Press, NY, 1991.

A chapter from Lecture Notes in Physics, 1990, Volume 370, here

Dobrev-Truini Irregular Uq(sl(3)) representations at roots of unity via Gel’fand–(Weyl)–Zetlin basis

Dobrev-Truini Polynomial realization of the Uq(sl(3)) Gel’fand–(Weyl)–Zetlin basis

MR1182163, MR1191199,

...and …and many others.

alsoAlso there is a paper by Abdesselam, Arnaudon, Chakrabarti and Abdesselam, Arnaudon, Chakrabarti:

and a discussion of dimensions by Mariana Pereira herehere:

Multiplet classification of highest weight modules over quantum universal enveloping algebras: the Uq(SL(3,C)) example in Groups St Andrews 1989 vol 1 LMS LNM #159

Representations of Quantum Groups, Symmetries in Science V (Lochau 1990), 93–135, Plenum Press, NY, 1991.

A chapter from Lecture Notes in Physics, 1990, Volume 370, here

Dobrev-Truini Irregular Uq(sl(3)) representations at roots of unity via Gel’fand–(Weyl)–Zetlin basis

Dobrev-Truini Polynomial realization of the Uq(sl(3)) Gel’fand–(Weyl)–Zetlin basis

MR1182163, MR1191199,

...and many others.

also there is a paper by Abdesselam, Arnaudon, Chakrabarti and a discussion of dimensions by Pereira here

…and many others.

Also there is a paper by Abdesselam, Arnaudon, Chakrabarti:

and a discussion of dimensions by Mariana Pereira here:

fix links
Source Link
M T
  • 2.7k
  • 3
  • 23
  • 30

I have tracked down some results on explicit classifications of simple modules for $u_q(\mathfrak{sl}_3)$. The general picture is that the simple modules are bigraded by the root lattice and look like towers of concentric hexagons.

For the benefit of anyone else interested, there is a long series of papers by Dobrev:

Multiplet classification of highest weight modules over quantum universal enveloping algebras: the Uq(SL(3,C)) example in Groups St Andrews 1989 vol 1 LMS LNM #159

Representations of Quantum Groups, Symmetries in Science V (Lochau 1990), 93–135, Plenum Press, NY, 1991.

A chapter from Lecture Notes in Physics, 1990, Volume 370, here

Dobrev-Truini Irregular Uq(sl(3)) representations at roots of unity via Gel’fand–(Weyl)–Zetlin basisIrregular Uq(sl(3)) representations at roots of unity via Gel’fand–(Weyl)–Zetlin basis

Dobrev-Truini Polynomial realization of the Uq(sl(3)) Gel’fand–(Weyl)–Zetlin basis

MR1182163MR1182163, MR1191199MR1191199,

...and many others.

also there is a paper by Abdesselam, Arnaudon, Chakrabarti and a discussion of dimensions by Pereira herehere

Some of the relevant material is hard to find and/or requires paying large sums of money to publishing corporations.

I have tracked down some results on explicit classifications of simple modules for $u_q(\mathfrak{sl}_3)$. The general picture is that the simple modules are bigraded by the root lattice and look like towers of concentric hexagons.

For the benefit of anyone else interested, there is a long series of papers by Dobrev:

Multiplet classification of highest weight modules over quantum universal enveloping algebras: the Uq(SL(3,C)) example in Groups St Andrews 1989 vol 1 LMS LNM #159

Representations of Quantum Groups, Symmetries in Science V (Lochau 1990), 93–135, Plenum Press, NY, 1991.

A chapter from Lecture Notes in Physics, 1990, Volume 370, here

Dobrev-Truini Irregular Uq(sl(3)) representations at roots of unity via Gel’fand–(Weyl)–Zetlin basis

Dobrev-Truini Polynomial realization of the Uq(sl(3)) Gel’fand–(Weyl)–Zetlin basis

MR1182163, MR1191199,

...and many others.

also there is a paper by Abdesselam, Arnaudon, Chakrabarti and a discussion of dimensions by Pereira here

Some of the relevant material is hard to find and/or requires paying large sums of money to publishing corporations.

I have tracked down some results on explicit classifications of simple modules for $u_q(\mathfrak{sl}_3)$. The general picture is that the simple modules are bigraded by the root lattice and look like towers of concentric hexagons.

For the benefit of anyone else interested, there is a long series of papers by Dobrev:

Multiplet classification of highest weight modules over quantum universal enveloping algebras: the Uq(SL(3,C)) example in Groups St Andrews 1989 vol 1 LMS LNM #159

Representations of Quantum Groups, Symmetries in Science V (Lochau 1990), 93–135, Plenum Press, NY, 1991.

A chapter from Lecture Notes in Physics, 1990, Volume 370, here

Dobrev-Truini Irregular Uq(sl(3)) representations at roots of unity via Gel’fand–(Weyl)–Zetlin basis

Dobrev-Truini Polynomial realization of the Uq(sl(3)) Gel’fand–(Weyl)–Zetlin basis

MR1182163, MR1191199,

...and many others.

also there is a paper by Abdesselam, Arnaudon, Chakrabarti and a discussion of dimensions by Pereira here

Some of the relevant material is hard to find and/or requires paying large sums of money to publishing corporations.

Source Link
M T
  • 2.7k
  • 3
  • 23
  • 30

I have tracked down some results on explicit classifications of simple modules for $u_q(\mathfrak{sl}_3)$. The general picture is that the simple modules are bigraded by the root lattice and look like towers of concentric hexagons.

For the benefit of anyone else interested, there is a long series of papers by Dobrev:

Multiplet classification of highest weight modules over quantum universal enveloping algebras: the Uq(SL(3,C)) example in Groups St Andrews 1989 vol 1 LMS LNM #159

Representations of Quantum Groups, Symmetries in Science V (Lochau 1990), 93–135, Plenum Press, NY, 1991.

A chapter from Lecture Notes in Physics, 1990, Volume 370, here

Dobrev-Truini Irregular Uq(sl(3)) representations at roots of unity via Gel’fand–(Weyl)–Zetlin basis

Dobrev-Truini Polynomial realization of the Uq(sl(3)) Gel’fand–(Weyl)–Zetlin basis

MR1182163, MR1191199,

...and many others.

also there is a paper by Abdesselam, Arnaudon, Chakrabarti and a discussion of dimensions by Pereira here

Some of the relevant material is hard to find and/or requires paying large sums of money to publishing corporations.