Timeline for group scheme neither affine, nor an abelian variety
Current License: CC BY-SA 3.0
8 events
| when toggle format | what | by | license | comment | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Jun 8, 2011 at 14:19 | history | edited | Florent MARTIN | CC BY-SA 3.0 |
deleted 32 characters in body
|
| May 18, 2011 at 20:26 | comment | added | Jim Humphreys | As my answer indicates, it's unclear precisely what you mean by your parenthetic statement. Being an affine group scheme doesn't imply having a realization as a matrix group. Certainly you want to consider the motivating examples mentioned in Brian Conrad's cited paper. | |
| May 18, 2011 at 13:22 | comment | added | Zoran Skoda | Related entry: mathoverflow.net/questions/43529/… | |
| May 18, 2011 at 11:21 | answer | added | Charles Matthews | timeline score: 3 | |
| May 18, 2011 at 11:20 | history | edited | Amritanshu Prasad |
edited tags
|
|
| May 18, 2011 at 10:24 | answer | added | Jim Humphreys | timeline score: 6 | |
| May 18, 2011 at 10:16 | answer | added | Bugs Bunny | timeline score: 21 | |
| May 18, 2011 at 9:55 | history | asked | Florent MARTIN | CC BY-SA 3.0 |