Timeline for An easy proof that $S(n)$ does not embed into $A(n+1)$?
Current License: CC BY-SA 3.0
4 events
| when toggle format | what | by | license | comment | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| May 16, 2011 at 9:31 | comment | added | darij grinberg | I wouldn't be surprised if this is just another mistake in Rotman. | |
| May 16, 2011 at 4:39 | comment | added | Qiaochu Yuan | @Len: then you might want to be more precise about what concepts Rotman has introduced by page 22. | |
| May 15, 2011 at 22:48 | comment | added | Len Schrieber | Thanks, that's a perfectly fine proof. And yet ... it uses concepts that Rotman has not yet introduced at page 22. | |
| May 15, 2011 at 21:51 | history | answered | darij grinberg | CC BY-SA 3.0 |