Timeline for Cite articles or book where I first found the result?
Current License: CC BY-SA 3.0
5 events
| when toggle format | what | by | license | comment | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| May 16, 2011 at 6:50 | history | made wiki | Post Made Community Wiki by S. Carnahan♦ | ||
| May 16, 2011 at 2:04 | comment | added | Deane Yang | Yemon, my sentiment is similar to the one you quote. It's just a question of broadly or generously one defines "likely to be useful". I prefer "might be useful". I want to be as helpful as I can be to the readers in opening them up to new ideas they've never seen before. | |
| May 15, 2011 at 23:19 | comment | added | Yemon Choi | I would upvote again if it were possible, for this sentiment: "So, the main criterion is to write primarily for the reader and the author should have the stand weather the article she cites are likely to be useful to reader or not at all;" | |
| May 15, 2011 at 23:18 | comment | added | Yemon Choi | +1. While I don't agree 100% with what Zoran says, he makes many of the points that I was clumsily trying to indicate in my comments. | |
| May 15, 2011 at 16:38 | history | answered | Zoran Skoda | CC BY-SA 3.0 |