Skip to main content
new answer
Source Link

SorryLet my answer be as above, I wrote a wrong assertion and I remove itnamely, if $\mu$ has no point masses, then we get squared moduli of the limits of the boundary values of the Cauchy tramsforms of $\mu$. For the purely point part of $\mu$ one has to add $\sum\left|\frac{\mu(\{z_n\})}{z-z_n}\right|^2$.

Sorry, I wrote a wrong assertion and I remove it.

Let my answer be as above, namely, if $\mu$ has no point masses, then we get squared moduli of the limits of the boundary values of the Cauchy tramsforms of $\mu$. For the purely point part of $\mu$ one has to add $\sum\left|\frac{\mu(\{z_n\})}{z-z_n}\right|^2$.

removed the commentary
Source Link

If $\mu>0$Sorry, the arithmetical means seem to tend to $2\int\frac{d\mu(\xi)}{|\xi-z|^2}$ (which may be infinite). I don't know where this could be proved,wrote a wrong assertion and I will be grateful for references, if anyremove it.

If $\mu>0$, the arithmetical means seem to tend to $2\int\frac{d\mu(\xi)}{|\xi-z|^2}$ (which may be infinite). I don't know where this could be proved, I will be grateful for references, if any.

Sorry, I wrote a wrong assertion and I remove it.

Source Link

If $\mu>0$, the arithmetical means seem to tend to $2\int\frac{d\mu(\xi)}{|\xi-z|^2}$ (which may be infinite). I don't know where this could be proved, I will be grateful for references, if any.