Timeline for semisimplicity of p-adic Galois representations
Current License: CC BY-SA 3.0
10 events
| when toggle format | what | by | license | comment | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Jun 27, 2011 at 6:26 | comment | added | mnr | See also notes of Colmez, math.jussieu.fr/~colmez/2009.pdf . Around page 10 he comments on p-adic distributions (and non-existence of "p-adic haar measures"). | |
| S May 14, 2011 at 23:59 | vote | accept | A. Pacetti | ||
| S May 14, 2011 at 23:58 | vote | accept | A. Pacetti | ||
| S May 14, 2011 at 23:59 | |||||
| May 13, 2011 at 4:51 | answer | added | JGordon | timeline score: 8 | |
| May 13, 2011 at 3:04 | answer | added | Emerton | timeline score: 10 | |
| May 12, 2011 at 23:49 | vote | accept | A. Pacetti | ||
| S May 14, 2011 at 23:58 | |||||
| May 12, 2011 at 21:40 | answer | added | Ramsey | timeline score: 2 | |
| May 12, 2011 at 21:38 | comment | added | Kevin Ventullo | Actually, you don't need Haar measure to prove semisimplicity of Galois representations over $\mathbb{C}$. It isn't hard to show that any continuous $\mathbb{C}$-representation of a profinite group must have finite image, so this already follows from the representation theory of finite groups. | |
| May 12, 2011 at 21:30 | answer | added | David Loeffler | timeline score: 19 | |
| May 12, 2011 at 20:17 | history | asked | A. Pacetti | CC BY-SA 3.0 |