Timeline for Natural transformations as categorical homotopies
Current License: CC BY-SA 3.0
28 events
when toggle format | what | by | license | comment | |
---|---|---|---|---|---|
Nov 13, 2013 at 10:27 | comment | added | Ronnie Brown | This idea was expressed for natural equivalences in the first, differently titled, 1968 edition of the book now available as "Topology and Groupoids": pages.bangor.ac.uk/~mas010/topgpds.html | |
Oct 28, 2011 at 7:15 | comment | added | Giorgio Mossa | @DavidWhite thanks, I thought it would be better to continue to ask here because the questions were strictly connected. I'll consider your recommendation for future. Thanks again. | |
Oct 27, 2011 at 22:29 | history | edited | David White |
edited tags
|
|
Oct 27, 2011 at 22:29 | comment | added | David White | Rather than edit this old question to ask (yet) another part, I recommend just asking a new question and linking to this one. Also, I'm going to retag because "recomandation" is not a word and there are no other questions with that tag. | |
Oct 27, 2011 at 15:25 | history | edited | Giorgio Mossa | CC BY-SA 3.0 |
Improved question
|
Sep 28, 2011 at 17:33 | history | edited | Giorgio Mossa | CC BY-SA 3.0 |
corrected last question
|
Sep 18, 2011 at 17:07 | history | edited | Giorgio Mossa | CC BY-SA 3.0 |
added 4 characters in body
|
Sep 17, 2011 at 17:11 | answer | added | Giorgio Mossa | timeline score: 4 | |
Sep 17, 2011 at 16:17 | answer | added | Ronnie Brown | timeline score: 4 | |
Sep 17, 2011 at 15:32 | history | edited | Giorgio Mossa | CC BY-SA 3.0 |
clarified question
|
Sep 14, 2011 at 16:02 | history | edited | Giorgio Mossa |
added a tag
|
|
Sep 11, 2011 at 13:40 | answer | added | John Klein | timeline score: 11 | |
Sep 9, 2011 at 22:07 | answer | added | DamienC | timeline score: 14 | |
Sep 9, 2011 at 16:46 | comment | added | Giorgio Mossa | @DamienC Thanks a lot, I really appreciate. :D | |
Sep 9, 2011 at 14:03 | comment | added | DamienC | I'll try to find some time to do this next week. But I can't promise (I'll soon have teaching duties, and I still have to work on preparing my lectures). | |
Sep 8, 2011 at 16:08 | comment | added | Giorgio Mossa | @DamienC I really appreciate your comment, I don't know very much about model categories so I'm wondering: "would you like to elaborate your comment in an answer in which discuss more completely this aspect of this definition of natural transformation?" (I think this argument is interesting and deserves to be in an answer) | |
Sep 8, 2011 at 15:14 | comment | added | DamienC | I am happy to give you my 300th vote for this question. It is not the way natural transformation are introduced, but it is actually the way people (should) think about them. IMHO this is the starting observation to make for introducing simplicial categories as a model for $\infty$-categories. | |
Sep 8, 2011 at 13:12 | history | edited | Giorgio Mossa |
added a tag
|
|
Sep 6, 2011 at 8:42 | history | edited | Giorgio Mossa | CC BY-SA 3.0 |
added new question, added a tag for reference request
|
Sep 3, 2011 at 16:55 | answer | added | Peter May | timeline score: 30 | |
Sep 3, 2011 at 9:33 | history | edited | Giorgio Mossa | CC BY-SA 3.0 |
corrected title
|
Jul 1, 2011 at 15:02 | comment | added | David White | Wow, this is a great way to think about natural transformations! I wish I'd seen this months ago | |
May 9, 2011 at 17:00 | answer | added | Michal R. Przybylek | timeline score: 7 | |
May 9, 2011 at 12:23 | history | edited | Martin Brandenburg | CC BY-SA 3.0 |
edited title
|
May 9, 2011 at 10:38 | comment | added | Todd Trimble | "anybody" does use this definition (you can find it somewhere on my [pretty much defunct] blog, for example). | |
May 9, 2011 at 10:34 | answer | added | user13113 | timeline score: 15 | |
May 9, 2011 at 9:50 | answer | added | Martin Brandenburg | timeline score: 11 | |
May 9, 2011 at 9:42 | history | asked | Giorgio Mossa | CC BY-SA 3.0 |