Skip to main content
9 events
when toggle format what by license comment
May 15, 2011 at 7:57 comment added Did Roland: I finally understood your point. But it yields the crude bound $1/4$ (to choose $a$) times $1/4$ (to choose $c$) times $1/2$ (to choose $b$), that is, $c_2\ge1/32$ (which is true).
May 4, 2011 at 17:48 comment added Robert Israel For a symmetric 2 x 2 matrix with entries uniformly distributed in $[-1,1]$ the probability of being positive definite is $\frac{1}{8} \int_0^1 da \int_0^1 dc \int_{-\sqrt{ac}}^{\sqrt{ac}} db = \frac{1}{9}$.
May 4, 2011 at 17:07 comment added Roland Bacher The above computation (for $c_2\geq 1/4$) uses $\alpha_2(2N)$.
May 4, 2011 at 15:49 comment added Did I thought $|a|$ and $|c|$ were a priori at most $N$? And that the conditions for positive definiteness were $a\ge0$, $c\ge0$ and $b^2\le ac$.
May 4, 2011 at 15:31 history edited Roland Bacher CC BY-SA 3.0
added 383 characters in body; edited body
May 4, 2011 at 15:13 comment added Roland Bacher In fact, $c_2=2\left(\int_0^1 t^{3/2}dt\right)^2=\frac{8}{25}$.
May 4, 2011 at 14:48 comment added Roland Bacher $c2\geq 1/4$ by considering $\left(\begin{array}{cc}a&b\\b&c\end{array}\right)$ with $a,c\in\lbrace N+1,\dots,2N\rbrace$ and $b\in \lbrace −N,…,N\rbrace$.
May 4, 2011 at 14:43 comment added Did Roland: nice question, as usual. $c_2=2/9$?
May 4, 2011 at 14:28 history asked Roland Bacher CC BY-SA 3.0