Timeline for What elementary problems can you solve with schemes?
Current License: CC BY-SA 3.0
4 events
when toggle format | what | by | license | comment | |
---|---|---|---|---|---|
Jul 29, 2017 at 23:36 | comment | added | Noam D. Elkies | That's a good elementary approach, but you need to use ${\mathbb C}^{n\times n}$, not ${\mathbb R}^{n\times n}$, because the matrices diagonalizable over the reals are not dense in ${\mathbb R}^{n\times n}$ once $n \geq 2$. Deducing the result for arbitrary fields doesn't require the infinite transcendence degree of $\mathbb R$: for each $n$, Cayley-Hamilton is a polynomial identity with integral coefficients, so once it's proved over $\mathbb Q$ it works for all fields (induction on the number of variables). | |
May 4, 2011 at 14:30 | comment | added | Johannes Hahn | You don't even need that: You prove density in $\mathbb{R}^{n\times n}$ w.r.t. the usual topology and derive the Cayley-Hamilton-theorem from that and then use the fact that there are infinitely many algebraicly independent real numbers. This allows you to view $\mathbb{Z}[X_{11},...,X_{nn}]$ as a subring of $\mathbb{R}$ and by specializing $X_{ij}$ to the value $x_{ij}\in R$ in any fixed commutative ring $R$ you can transport the Cayley-Hamilton-equation from $\mathbb{Z}$ to $R$. | |
May 4, 2011 at 10:16 | comment | added | Asaf | You can prove this result without the usage of schemes. One just need to know what's an irreducible variety is. | |
May 4, 2011 at 4:43 | history | answered | Yuhao Huang | CC BY-SA 3.0 |