Timeline for Why forgetful functors usually have LEFT adjoint?
Current License: CC BY-SA 2.5
5 events
| when toggle format | what | by | license | comment | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Apr 28, 2016 at 8:52 | comment | added | goblin GONE | I strongly object to the notion that a forgetful functor ought to be faithful, and I also strongly object to the notion that a forgetful functor ought to have a left adjoint... | |
| Nov 23, 2009 at 16:39 | history | edited | Theo Johnson-Freyd | CC BY-SA 2.5 |
Added more content.
|
| Nov 23, 2009 at 1:47 | comment | added | alekzander | I don't think I've ever seen it defined as such, but it has surely been strongly hinted at. | |
| Nov 21, 2009 at 21:24 | comment | added | Jose Capco | agreed.. so far, I haven't seen any reference that really rigorously defines what is category-therotically meant by a "forgetful functor". | |
| Nov 21, 2009 at 17:50 | history | answered | Theo Johnson-Freyd | CC BY-SA 2.5 |