Timeline for Subshifts with the same entropy
Current License: CC BY-SA 3.0
10 events
| when toggle format | what | by | license | comment | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Jun 26, 2011 at 0:19 | answer | added | Marcelo | timeline score: 2 | |
| May 2, 2011 at 18:07 | vote | accept | CommunityBot | moved from User.Id=6976 by developer User.Id=69903 | |
| May 1, 2011 at 12:58 | answer | added | Stephen Shea | timeline score: 2 | |
| May 1, 2011 at 10:16 | answer | added | user6976 | timeline score: 2 | |
| May 1, 2011 at 3:18 | comment | added | user6976 | @Nikita: I mean the statement in AGW's paper. They have a precise definition there. The paper seems to be well known to specialists (I am not one of them, though), so I decided not to repeat it here. My question is whether the statement (as formulated by AGW) is still valid with the assumption that $n$ is an integer. | |
| May 1, 2011 at 3:01 | comment | added | Nikita Sidorov | This is a bit vague... What "measure 0" do you mean if we have two topological subshifts? Ornstein's theorem for any two Bernoulli shifts is of course still valid if you have two Markov subshifts endowed with Markov measures. | |
| May 1, 2011 at 1:01 | history | edited | user6976 | CC BY-SA 3.0 |
added 178 characters in body; added 40 characters in body
|
| May 1, 2011 at 0:15 | answer | added | Nishant Chandgotia | timeline score: 5 | |
| May 1, 2011 at 0:02 | history | edited | user6976 | CC BY-SA 3.0 |
added 30 characters in body
|
| Apr 30, 2011 at 23:43 | history | asked | user6976 | CC BY-SA 3.0 |