Timeline for On the Separability of Certain Extensions of Fields
Current License: CC BY-SA 3.0
11 events
when toggle format | what | by | license | comment | |
---|---|---|---|---|---|
Apr 13, 2017 at 12:58 | history | edited | CommunityBot |
replaced http://mathoverflow.net/ with https://mathoverflow.net/
|
|
Mar 21, 2016 at 16:42 | history | edited | David | CC BY-SA 3.0 |
"made" by "asked"
|
Aug 4, 2011 at 6:40 | history | undeleted | S. Carnahan♦ | ||
May 12, 2011 at 23:41 | history | deleted | user6930 | ||
May 9, 2011 at 6:09 | comment | added | David | @Laurent: Thanks for your instructive example. I have made a revision (see below). | |
May 9, 2011 at 6:08 | answer | added | David | timeline score: 2 | |
May 1, 2011 at 10:22 | comment | added | Laurent Moret-Bailly | It's the ring of the valuation on $\mathbb{F}_p(t,z^p)$ induced by the $t$-adic valuation on $\mathbb{F}_p((t))$. | |
May 1, 2011 at 9:51 | comment | added | David | Thanks. I'll think about it. Right now I have only a question: (I hope this don't be too obvious, but) why is A a DVR? Why is it actually Noetherian? | |
May 1, 2011 at 7:43 | comment | added | Laurent Moret-Bailly | Something's wrong. There are discrete valuation rings $A$ of char. $p>0$ such that $K(\widehat{A})$ is inseparable over $K(A)$. For instance, choose some $z\in\mathbb{F}_p[[t]]$ which is transcendental over $\mathbb{F}_p(t)$. Then take $A=\mathbb{F}_p[[t]]\cap\mathbb{F}_p(t,z^p)$. Then $A$ is a DVR containing $\mathbb{F}_p[t]$, with completion $\mathbb{F}_p[[t]]$, but we have $z\in\widehat{A}$, $z^p\in A$ and $z\notin K(A)$. | |
Apr 30, 2011 at 20:07 | history | edited | David | CC BY-SA 3.0 |
deleted 8 characters in body; added 6 characters in body
|
Apr 30, 2011 at 20:01 | history | asked | David | CC BY-SA 3.0 |