Timeline for Spinor norm interpretation for a specific orthogonal group?
Current License: CC BY-SA 3.0
5 events
| when toggle format | what | by | license | comment | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Apr 26, 2011 at 13:52 | comment | added | mander | The referee asked whether there is a simple explanation of the spinor norm in the quaternary case as there is in the ternary case in terms of det, as explained above. To my knowledge there isn't. It certainly isn't in Omeara or Dieudonne, for example. Agreed the spinor norm is very nice to begin with. Thanks for your comment. | |
| Apr 26, 2011 at 12:27 | comment | added | Tom De Medts | What do you mean by "nice"? I would say that the spinor norm is very nice in itself, so it's hard to come up with something even nicer... | |
| Apr 26, 2011 at 1:50 | history | edited | mander | CC BY-SA 3.0 |
added 1 characters in body
|
| Apr 25, 2011 at 14:57 | history | edited | mander | CC BY-SA 3.0 |
added 3 characters in body
|
| Apr 25, 2011 at 14:47 | history | asked | mander | CC BY-SA 3.0 |