Skip to main content

Timeline for Question on PDE

Current License: CC BY-SA 3.0

6 events
when toggle format what by license comment
Apr 26, 2011 at 2:46 comment added Turbo "Getting the PDE to stop diffusing without introducing an artificial stopping time would be more subtle." Actually I think I am interested in exactly this "automation" of the stopping times so that the description of the PDEs themselves would capture the closest neighbors. Such a description could provide an analytical gadget to some euclidean graph problems
Apr 26, 2011 at 2:27 comment added Aaron Hoffman (continued) ... and then call a collision any time that $|A_i - A_j| \ge r_i + r_j$. Getting the PDE to stop diffusing without introducing an artificial stopping time would be more subtle.
Apr 26, 2011 at 2:24 comment added Aaron Hoffman Caveat: Maybe I'm not understanding your question. I am imagining $u_t = D\Delta u$ where $u(x,t) \in \R^m$ and $x \in \R^n$ and $D$ is a diagonal matrix with entries $k_i$. This is just a collection of uncoupled heat equations in $\R^n$ whose fundamental solution is just a vector of Gaussians. It sounds like the solution that you are interested in corresponds to $u_i$ a Gaussian centered at $A_i$. The stopping time is introduced artificially by picking levels $\epsilon_i$ and taking logarithms of the Gaussians to solve for the radius of the spherical level set as a function of time ...
Apr 26, 2011 at 1:55 comment added Turbo I am wondering what the system would look like for more than $3$ points in $n \ge 3$ dimensions.
Apr 26, 2011 at 1:54 comment added Turbo Hi Aaron: Thank you for the answer. Can you write explicitly the system of PDEs that will start diffusing and stop at the closest neighbor's level set?
Apr 25, 2011 at 11:06 history answered Aaron Hoffman CC BY-SA 3.0