Skip to main content

Timeline for Path connectedness of varieties

Current License: CC BY-SA 3.0

10 events
when toggle format what by license comment
May 21, 2013 at 22:44 answer added Sean Lawton timeline score: 7
Apr 26, 2011 at 0:06 vote accept Brian
Apr 25, 2011 at 2:50 answer added roy smith timeline score: 46
Apr 24, 2011 at 22:29 comment added Pete L. Clark We have some more than adequate answers given in the comments. Would one of the commenters be willing to step up and actually answer the question in the formal MO sense?
Apr 24, 2011 at 15:30 comment added Brian Dear Roy Smith: Thanks a lot for your explanation about using blowing up so that Bertini (the form given in Hartshorne) can be applied.
Apr 24, 2011 at 15:29 comment added Brian Dear Karl Schwede: Thanks a lot for your answer. My question about the curve is indeed a very dumb one.
Apr 24, 2011 at 15:24 comment added Karl Schwede Brian, J.C. Ottem is right. You can just use Bertini. To your question of whether every curve is the image of a non-singular one, the answer is yes, just take the normalization of the curve (see the section on curves in the first chapter of Hartshorne). I don't know what you mean by segment on a curve though.
Apr 24, 2011 at 14:46 comment added Brian The version in Hartshorne requires $X$ has at most a finite number of singular points and that $X$ projective (or equivalently, projective with a finite number of points removed). Do you have a more general form in mind? Also, your answer leads to another question (probably a dumb one that I cannot think of): curves are parametrizable, i.e. any segment on a curve is an image of a non-singular curve?
Apr 24, 2011 at 14:36 comment added J.C. Ottem If $X$ is quasi-projective and of dim $\ge 2$, you can use Bertini's theorem on a sufficiently general hyperplane section through P and Q.
Apr 24, 2011 at 14:18 history asked Brian CC BY-SA 3.0