Timeline for Jacobson-Bourbaki correspondence
Current License: CC BY-SA 3.0
6 events
| when toggle format | what | by | license | comment | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Apr 23, 2011 at 18:12 | comment | added | Stephan F. Kroneck | @ Qiaochu Yuan: probably easiest if I just give you this link: eom.springer.de/J/j110010.htm Kind regards, Stephan. | |
| Apr 23, 2011 at 17:56 | comment | added | Qiaochu Yuan | What is the Jacobson-Bourbaki correspondence? | |
| Apr 23, 2011 at 17:06 | comment | added | Stephan F. Kroneck | (No, I'm afraid I can't get into MathSciNet.) Hopefully nobody misunderstands the intention of my question; I most certainly did not want to detract from the merit of the Jacobson-Bourbaki correspondence as such, quite the contrary ! I just find it a pity that such a fine instrument is left in the toolkit unused (seemingly) ... Kind regrads, Stephan. | |
| Apr 23, 2011 at 16:43 | history | edited | Jim Humphreys | CC BY-SA 3.0 |
edited title
|
| Apr 23, 2011 at 16:42 | comment | added | Jim Humphreys | If you can access MathSciNet, you might get some clues from a simple 'Anywhere' search of their database for 'Jacobson-Bourbaki'. This returns 31 items, ranging from a paper by Henri Cartan (1947) to one by Lars Kadison (2008). Of course, that kind of search doesn't get into the texts of articles. My point (as a non-specialist) is that further developments of mathematical ideas almost always occur; but whether they are 'interesting' is another question. | |
| Apr 23, 2011 at 16:15 | history | asked | Stephan F. Kroneck | CC BY-SA 3.0 |