Timeline for Is analytic Quillen-Suslin simple?
Current License: CC BY-SA 3.0
6 events
| when toggle format | what | by | license | comment | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Apr 23, 2011 at 19:57 | comment | added | Georges Elencwajg | Dear Henri, yes of course. Thank you for catching this silly typo. | |
| Apr 23, 2011 at 12:38 | history | edited | Georges Elencwajg | CC BY-SA 3.0 |
added an example.
|
| Apr 23, 2011 at 11:58 | history | edited | Georges Elencwajg | CC BY-SA 3.0 |
corrected typo
|
| Apr 23, 2011 at 11:47 | comment | added | Henri | Do you mean $rk(F) = [n/2]$? | |
| Apr 23, 2011 at 11:46 | comment | added | Georges Elencwajg | Ah, I see that SGP has simultaneously posted a reference to Griffiths that might very well be what inspired Forster's talk. Unfortunately I don't have access to that book... | |
| Apr 23, 2011 at 11:41 | history | answered | Georges Elencwajg | CC BY-SA 3.0 |