Timeline for Simple terminology question about the Dubrovnik (Kauffman) polynomial
Current License: CC BY-SA 3.0
4 events
| when toggle format | what | by | license | comment | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| May 5, 2011 at 18:15 | comment | added | Noah Snyder | Right, basically they only get special names if they were discovered and named prior to Reshetikhin-Turaev's work. Anyway which of those families did it turn out to be? I commented instead of answering just because I didn't know which one was the right answer, but it'd be good to actually have an answer posted. | |
| Apr 21, 2011 at 13:50 | comment | added | Hauke Reddmann | Close enough. (Identified, but not "specially named".) The paper even answers some questions I didn't ask yet :-) | |
| Apr 20, 2011 at 16:37 | comment | added | Noah Snyder | This is probably one of the families SO(2n+1), SO(2n), SP(2n), or OSP(1|2n). Figuring out which requires chasing through a bunch of conventions, but if you look at the background to our paper (with Scott and Emily) arxiv.org/abs/1003.0022 you should be able to sort it out. In particular look at page 7 for our conventions for Dubrovnik and the bottom of page 9 for the specializations giving those families. | |
| Apr 20, 2011 at 15:08 | history | asked | Hauke Reddmann | CC BY-SA 3.0 |