Timeline for $\mathbb{P}^n$ is simply connected
Current License: CC BY-SA 3.0
11 events
| when toggle format | what | by | license | comment | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Dec 19, 2011 at 14:35 | vote | accept | Martin Brandenburg | ||
| Apr 21, 2011 at 8:23 | history | edited | Martin Brandenburg | CC BY-SA 3.0 |
deleted 49 characters in body
|
| Apr 20, 2011 at 14:45 | answer | added | Lars | timeline score: 2 | |
| Apr 20, 2011 at 13:06 | answer | added | Emerton | timeline score: 16 | |
| Apr 20, 2011 at 7:41 | answer | added | ACL | timeline score: 12 | |
| Apr 20, 2011 at 7:16 | comment | added | user5117 | This comment is a little late, since the question has been answered, but let me just say that the statement "There are n obvious closed immersions P^1→P^n, along which we may pull back a finite étale morphism, but they do not cover P^n" seems a bit strange to me. (There are a lot more than n ways to embed P^1 in P^n, and they all seem to me to be equally obvious.) Am I missing something? | |
| Apr 20, 2011 at 5:47 | answer | added | Sándor Kovács | timeline score: 8 | |
| Apr 19, 2011 at 18:41 | answer | added | Sándor Kovács | timeline score: 19 | |
| Apr 19, 2011 at 18:37 | answer | added | Angelo | timeline score: 32 | |
| Apr 19, 2011 at 17:05 | answer | added | BS. | timeline score: 4 | |
| Apr 19, 2011 at 15:18 | history | asked | Martin Brandenburg | CC BY-SA 3.0 |