Skip to main content

Timeline for Dimension leaps

Current License: CC BY-SA 3.0

4 events
when toggle format what by license comment
Apr 29 at 13:04 comment added Aurel Dimensions 26, 27 and 28 have now been done by G. Chenevier and B. Allombert.
Apr 19, 2011 at 16:00 comment added Richard Borcherds It's doable in 26 dimensions, just MUCH harder than in 25 dimensions. The main obstruction is that there seems no point in doing it; all one would get for a lot of effort would be a boring list of a couple of thousand lattices. (Their root systems have already been found by King by finding the mass of each root system.)
Apr 19, 2011 at 1:18 comment added Henry Cohn Is this really undoable in $26$ dimensions? I'm not at all an expert, but my assumption has been that it could probably be done by computer, but just wouldn't be nearly as nice or interesting as in $25$ dimensions (since the beautiful $II_{25,1}$ picture would be missing). However, I've never really thought through how complex it might be. Do you think it could be done by, say, a bright undergraduate with a love of programming, a lot of spare time, and access to a big cluster? Or would it require a serious new idea to make it feasible?
Apr 18, 2011 at 20:24 history answered Richard Borcherds CC BY-SA 3.0