Timeline for (A very limited instance of) Lagrange's Theorem's converse and A_5
Current License: CC BY-SA 3.0
7 events
| when toggle format | what | by | license | comment | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Apr 19, 2011 at 3:00 | vote | accept | DavidLHarden | ||
| Apr 17, 2011 at 20:01 | answer | added | Derek Holt | timeline score: 10 | |
| Apr 16, 2011 at 20:58 | answer | added | Geoff Robinson | timeline score: 5 | |
| Apr 16, 2011 at 17:12 | history | edited | DavidLHarden | CC BY-SA 3.0 |
title is less overstated, since this is not about the converse in much generality
|
| Apr 16, 2011 at 17:07 | comment | added | Jim Humphreys | The "converse" in the header is overstated, since the question concerns only a very special type of divisibility. Aside from that minor point, it's hard to avoid quoting a big chunk of the classification work such as what's involved in determining all possible minimal nonabelian simple groups and their orders. | |
| Apr 16, 2011 at 7:43 | answer | added | Charles Matthews | timeline score: 1 | |
| Apr 16, 2011 at 3:58 | history | asked | DavidLHarden | CC BY-SA 3.0 |